Customize your website

URB decision supports 500-foot setback



Tina Comeau
Published on August 19, 2010
Published on August 19, 2010
Tina Comeau  RSS Feed

The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (URB) has dismissed an appeal challenging a minimum 500-foot setback requirement the Municipality of Yarmouth introduced last fall. The setback creates a buffer between lakes and waterways and farming operations.

Topics :
Nova Scotia Mink Breeders Association , RN Farms , Yarmouth municipal council , Sloans Lake , Yarmouth

The appellants had included several farmers and the Nova Scotia Mink Breeders Association who argued the increased setback – made by means of an amendment to a municipal land-use bylaw – was not in keeping with the intent of the municipal planning strategy.

But in a decision dated Aug. 12, the URB said Yarmouth municipal council had reasonably carried out the intent of the strategy.

The municipality amended its land-use bylaw last fall. The amendment increased the required minimum setback distance of buildings, structures, pen areas, manure piles, manure storage facilities and burial sites for the disposal of dead animals used in connection with mink and fox ranches, hog and fowl operations from 328 feet to 500 feet from any off-site waterwell or any watercourse or waterbody.

At the time of the amendment public concern and anxiety was high over blue-green algae that has been polluting lakes in the area. Many believe runoff from mink farms is a contributing factor. At the time the municipality had also received an application from R&N Farms Limited for a development permit to build a mink farm on Sloans Lake.

During a URB hearing, the board heard from three organic farmers who spoke to the difficulty of being included in the definition of a fox, mink, hog or fowl operation, given that they are not intensive livestock operations.

 One of the appellants, farmer Kevin Hamilton, was concerned the increased setback requirement may result in fewer farms in the area. He said, for instance, there is a farm next door to him that he might be interested in purchasing, but the barn is within 500 feet of the well and therefore could not be used.

The appellants had also argued the setback had no foundation and was arbitrary.

The municipality had held a public hearing last September about the proposed amendment to its bylaw. The URB noted that of the 19 people who gave oral presentations, only two opposed. And of the 22 written submissions the municipality received, only one person opposed the bylaw.

The URB also noted that the evidence before it showed that during the public hearing the president of the Nova Scotia Mink Breeders Association said a 500-foot set-back was fine and that they would work with the community. The board notes in its decision that the association did not address this in its arguments or evidence presented to the URB.

In its decision the URB also noted that a 2009 Nine Lakes Report issued by the Department of Environment recommended municipalities do what they could to prevent nutrients from affecting the water quality of lakes and recommended that one of the methods of doing so was to create buffers.

(You can read the URB's decision by clicking on this link to visit the recent decisions section of the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board website and searching for Decision - PL - Nova Scotia Mink Breeders Association and Kevin Hamilton, et al)  

Board rules mink application can’t be based on old bylaw

The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board says that although an application by R&N Farms Limited for a development permit for a mink farm was completed before the Municipality of Yarmouth amended a bylaw dealing with setbacks, the application can’t be based on the old bylaw.

In a July 28 decision, the URB says any application, whether complete or not, may not have a permit issued after the date that a municipality has advertised its intent to amend a bylaw.

According to the URB, R&N completed its application for a mink farm on Sept. 4, 2009. At that time the existing bylaw of the municipality stated that buildings, structures, pen areas, manure storage facilities and burial sites for dead animals must be set back a minimum of 328 feet from any off-site waterwell, watercourse of waterbody.

But on Sept. 8, 2009 the municipality advertised its intent to amend the bylaw to increase the setback to 500 feet.

 “The board finds that any permit not issued by the date of the publication of the first notice of advertising is not entitled to receive a permit under the existing bylaw, it must be consistent with the proposed bylaw,” the URB decision reads.

(You can read this decision by clicking on this link to visit the recent decisions section of the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board website and searching for Decision - PL - R&N Farms Limited.)

The Vanguard

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

Farm Focus is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Ad Finder

February 9th 2012

View our Newspaper ads

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Advertising