Customize your website

False perceptions plow under benefits of pesticides: toxicologist



False perceptions plow under benefits of pesticides: toxicologist

False perceptions plow under benefits of pesticides: toxicologist

Published on March 4, 2010
Published on May 5, 2010
Steve Sharratt  RSS Feed

Society has developed such a fear of chemicals that the positive benefits of pesticides are plowed under because of a litany of false perceptions, says a leading toxicologist.

Topics :
Health Canada , Syngenta Canada , Canadian Cancer Society , Charlottetown , Prince Edward Island , Idaho

Society has developed such a fear of chemicals that the positive benefits of pesticides are plowed under because of a litany of false perceptions, says a leading toxicologist.
"Risks from pesticides are low," says Dr. Angela Hofstra. "And despite a false public perception that they are a danger, the benefits are very high."
A guest speaker at the recent International Potato Expo in Charlottetown, (Prince Edward Island) Hofstra said the perception today is that everything man-made is bad while everything natural is good.
"But everything consists of chemicals, even things that are natural," she told a workshop full of farmers and industry reps. "But give them a chemical name and people get worried."
She recited a situation where she was asked to intervene and provide insight when officials at a university were concerned about the exposure levels of dihydrogen oxide to workers and students.
Such incidents have occurred more often than not.
In 1997, a 14-year-old high school student in Idaho gathered 43 names out of 50 classmates to ban dihydrogen oxide. Nathan Zohner, according to Wikipedia, ended up winning first prize at the state Science Fair for his illustration of gullibility.
Dihydrogen oxide is water and the hoax only emphasizes the public lack of scientific literacy.
Hofstra said chemicals have gone from being heroes in the 1960s to today's villains despite being greatly improved, less toxic, and undergoing the most stringent regulations possible for Health Canada approval.
One crop protectant rep at the workshop insisted he sells "agricultural medicine" and the name "pesticide" has been a bane to the industry for decades.
She said new chemicals take years to reach the marketplace after being tested to mimic worst-case scenarios on human health.
"It's the dose that makes a huge difference to actual safety," she explained, noting that general minimum exposure limits set by Health Canada would be equivalent to one kernel of corn from the harvest of 100 acres.
Hofstra, who works for Syngenta Canada, said over 70 per cent of Americans think pesticide residue on food can cause cancer. She also noted the Canadian Cancer Society has dropped pesticides from its main culprits of causing cancer.

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

Farm Focus is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Ad Finder

February 5th 2012

View our Newspaper ads

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Advertising