One view on EI changes



Published on September 8, 2011
Published on September 8, 2011
Topics :
Service Canada , Human Resources , Skills Development Canada

Canadians across this country gave our government a strong mandate to complete our economic recovery and eliminate the deficit. After all, out of control spending and debt in other countries are major causes of the economic problems facing the world today.

That is why our Conservative government is taking action to ensure that Canadians’ hard-earned tax dollars are being used most effectively and efficiently. Hard-working Canadians have told us, loud and clear, that government needs to deliver the services that Canadians rely on in a way that is leaner, more modern and more efficient.

The way in which EI claims are processed is out-dated and inefficient. Currently, Service Canada employees in 120 offices all across the country manually administer thousands of pieces of paper every month. The wide dispersion of offices leaves little room for co-ordinating work volumes or schedules.

Over the next three years we will consolidate processing positions from 120 locations to 22 locations, moving to an electronic file management system that will deliver services at a lower cost to taxpayers. 

Canadians may understandably be concerned that this may mean that services will be slower or lower quality. I can confidently say that these changes will have no impact on the in-person services Canadians receive at Service Canada offices.

Furthermore, only back office work will be consolidated; zero front desk Service Canada offices will be closed. To be clear, this means Canadians will continue to be able to access services at their local office when this process is complete.

Service Canada and Human Resources and Skills Development Canada will be working hard over the next three years to minimize the impact on affected employees.

Some organizations have chosen to spread misinformation among employees. Let me be clear: there will be no mass layoffs. 

Efforts by union bosses to protect their narrow interests at the expense of taxpayers are simply unfair to workers and unfair to taxpayers.

Our employees are incredibly skilled, and valuable. We will work with employees to manage these changes through attrition, training and transfers to other locations. And we intend to fully respect our collective agreements.

Our government will move forward towards a stronger, faster and more efficient EI system that will benefit all Canadians.

Hon. Diane Finley

Minister of Human Resources and

Skills Development Canada

See this article on The Telegram newspaper

Comments

  • Username
    Concerned
    - September 10, 2011 at 11:54:39

    notice she states in person will not be affected. what about the processing of EI claims. Right now you have to wait well over 28 days to process a claim. What happens if we don't replace the retiring workers and we close the processing centres. She is using a play on words and not addressing the real situation here. How long now will it take to get your EI claim processed. How many times will each client have to call the call centre to get their money. Think about it. She is not addressing the issues.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Carol J.
    - September 8, 2011 at 18:00:46

    " military activities (which make our world safer and more prosperous for all of us." Seriously? Which world are you on? I'm sure there are a few people (many on the other side of the world) who might not see things the same way.

    Submit a Comment

    • Username
      Carl
      - September 9, 2011 at 13:30:57

      I can tell you that beyond a shadow of a doubt, based on my first-hand experience, that the vast majority of Afghans are grateful for our presence there, and feel safer and freer without the Taliban in power. I can also assure you that the vast majority of Libyans appreciate NATO's efforts and feel safer and freer without Ghadhafi in power. Can you furnish a single example in which Canada has intervened militarily in any country and left its people feeling less secure?

  • Username
    Lance
    - September 8, 2011 at 15:02:00

    This is typical of the divisive language the Neo Cons use to divide the public: hard-working taxpayers vs. the idle poor, union workers vs. non-union, public employees vs. the rest of us. Fortunately only about 35% percent of the population are stunned enough to fall for this technique; unfortunately, this constitutes a “majority.”

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    someone
    - September 8, 2011 at 14:54:47

    why cant they focus on what people get for being on EI nevermind locations and employees .. i went on maternity leave in january i'm only getting 500 dollars every two weeks from them thats noit enough to cover bills, rent, insurance, food, clothing and what not . i dont even see the since of having this option if ur not gonna get enough to cover basic nacessaties for a month ridiculous!!

    Submit a Comment

    • Username
      Jason D
      - September 8, 2011 at 18:01:46

      So you think other workers and taxpayers should pay more so you have recieve higher maternity benefits? How do you justify this selfish position? Your fellow Canadians may be generous enough to help you financially so you can stay home and care for your child, but don't expect us to pay for ALL of your expenses. Your parenting and career choices are still primarily your own responsibility.

    • Username
      Bob
      - September 9, 2011 at 11:51:10

      Your thousand dollars a month is the same amount as my company pension for which I worked 30 years. Something tells me you didn't work that long for your "package".

  • Username
    Blair
    - September 8, 2011 at 12:04:08

    Forcing through back to work legislation for private companies, legislation that invalidates negotiated contracts, legislation that removes workers charter rights, and legislation that circumvents the Public Service Modernization Act to force through layoffs and job changes in which Public Service Unions are suppose to be consulted. There is lots of misinformation out there but it comes from the Harper Neo Cons not the Public Service Unions.

    Submit a Comment

    • Username
      Carl
      - September 8, 2011 at 15:01:20

      As a working citizen who pays taxes, I want the government to provide services as efficiently as possible. I also want in-person services available to me if I ever have to access the EI system I have been paying into. Sounds like the government is striking this balance just right.

    • Username
      Lane
      - September 8, 2011 at 15:01:05

      The above comment is full of misinformation from an apparent unionist. No federal government has ever passes any "legislation that removes workers' (or anyone else's) charter rights." For that to happen, the notwithstanding clause would have to be invoked - and this has never been done by any federal government. It is also impossible to invalidate a negotiated contract through legislation, and this has never been done or attempted.

  • Username
    Politically Incorrect
    - September 8, 2011 at 12:02:51

    "Union Bosses?!" I was unaware that unions had bosses -- I was under the impression that union leaderships are elected by the members-at-large. I know businesses have bosses, but you never hear the term "Big Business Bosses;" at least from the right wing -- no, they're respected "Business leaders." And why are "taxpayers" always "hard-working." (I'm a complete slack-arsed taxpayer). And the "loud and clear" [sic] message from this Canadian is that I'm a little fed up with having the working class having to make sacrifices for your government's "out of control spending," on wars, tax breaks to the business bosses, and corporate bailouts on which you blame on the workers. Furthermore Honourable Member, I'm a CITIZEN, not a taxpayer.

    Submit a Comment

    • Username
      Abigail
      - September 8, 2011 at 14:56:29

      You're right that spending it out of control, but it is not being wasted on military activities (which make our world safer and more prosperous for all of us), or on tax breaks for big businesses (corporate tax revenues are up 7.5% in the last year according to a recent report, whereas personal income tax revenues have only risen half that amount), or on corporate bailouts (I assume you're talking about the bailout of the auto companies, which saved tens of thousands of jobs, and cost taxpayers nothing because it made a huge profit on its equity in the auto companies involved in addition to preserving huge amounts of corporate and personal income tax revenue that would not exist if the companies went under). But there is tons of government waste - mostly in the form of bloated bureaucracies.

  • Username
    Foghorn Leghorn
    - September 8, 2011 at 12:02:11

    If the system can be run so efficiently electronically why even have 22 locations why not only have 1?

    Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

Farm Focus is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Ad Finder

May 22nd 2012

View our Newspaper ads

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Advertising