Battling Burke



Published on September 9, 2011
Published on September 9, 2011
Topics :
CBC , Mount Pearl

It’s nice to see that Education Minister Joan Burke hasn’t lost her edge — she’s just as abrasive now as she was when she was arguing that her direct interference in the selection of a new president for Memorial University was some kind of divine right of cabinet ministers.

This time, the issue is the safety of schoolchildren — and in an interview with the CBC’s Ted Blades on Wednesday, the minister of education was not pulling any punches.

To put it simply, Burke made it plain that the provincial government has no intention of joining the City of St. John’s in paying for school crossing guards.

Every municipality in the province isn’t clamouring for paid school crossing guards, Burke told Blades. 

True enough — but every municipality doesn’t have schools where elementary schoolchildren cross four lanes of traffic every day, either.

Most municipalities would scratch their heads about the whole concept: especially in rural parts of the province, whole schools see students arrive on buses or in private vehicles, because walking to school simply isn’t an option.

Then, Burke offered up a delightful bit of callous logic: her department is responsible for the safety of schoolchildren when they are on school buses and once they set foot on school property.

The implication?

At any other time, from a safety point of view, children are on their own.

Burke is technically right on that point — but her position sounded more like someone weighing potential legal liabilities than it did someone actually considering the best way to ensure the safety of children.

But there was more.

Burke then hung her hat on the argument that there must be other models that would work for protecting schoolchildren, suggesting that schools and school councils look at ways to provide the service without having paid crossing guards.

Read between the lines and the implication was clear: “other models” means depending on volunteer guards to fill the need.

What on Earth would this province do without the volunteers — from firefighters on down — who do so much valuable work for free? Strange: Burke isn’t suggesting that there are “other models” for filling cabinet posts — even though the reduction of just one minister’s position in the provincial cabinet would fully pay for the St. John’s crossing guard program in perpetuity.

Dangerous road crossings to schools in this province are, for the most part, a strictly urban affair, a risk limited to St. John’s, Mount Pearl and perhaps Corner Brook.

It’s all well and good for the minister of education to wash government’s hands of any legal responsibility, but it would be a completely different story if a child is injured — or worse — because the City of St. John’s finds it can’t carry the financial weight of the crossing guards program alone.

Comments

  • Username
    Mary
    - September 10, 2011 at 15:37:48

    A lot of tax dollars goes into getting children to school safely on a bus, some money should go into getting them there safely on foot!

    Submit a Comment

    • Username
      Miranda
      - September 10, 2011 at 16:42:24

      Individual towns and cities are not expected to pay for school bus drivers....or look for "volunteer" school bus drivers - how are crossing guards different? The bottom line is to get children to school safely - either by bus or on foot.

  • Username
    Bridge Worker
    - September 10, 2011 at 11:55:21

    As Joan Burke would say: "That's Bu!!ShIt."

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    John Smith
    - September 10, 2011 at 11:51:16

    I agree with the minister, 120,000 a year for ten years is 1.2 mill. Next it will be corner brook GFW ect. Where does it end. I am sick of the stance of the telegram, always anti PC gov. all the time...no matter what. No wonder this rag is just about ready to fold.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    stanley
    - September 9, 2011 at 11:48:54

    Once again the editor takes the opportunity to personally insult politicians, taking focus away from the issue he's trying to discuss. He chooses to attack someone by calling them abrasive, callous, not appreciative of volunteers, and of course caring about legal bills over children. This "I'm better than you" drivel needs to end. Go ahead and critize the decision, stop personally insulting people.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Mo
    - September 9, 2011 at 09:02:56

    She is a nasty self-absorbed piece of work who will easily get re-elected so get used to it. Blame Kevin Aylward and Yvonne Jones for making this happen.

    Submit a Comment

    • Username
      Bob
      - September 10, 2011 at 13:54:51

      Hey MO..Blame Aylward and Jones? How about the voters?

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

Farm Focus is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Ad Finder

May 22nd 2012

View our Newspaper ads

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Advertising